About Me

Name:Redhead
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Liberal Logic


Well, the series on Liberal Logic is complete, at least for now. It has been a huge success, receiving at least two visitors per post. As originally posted, the liberal mindset is full of flawed thinking and contradictory views. For a group that claims to value scientific thinking over religion, they really rely on faith to support their positions. But of course, it’s not really about any of these issues. It’s about Control.
 
The original series was to be seven posts, but grew into ten. Again, this confirms my Engineer’s OCD. So, if you missed any of them, they are linked below, along with the Redhead or Redneck counterpart to the post, or you can click here to see the whole series in reverse order. I do use a lot of links in my articles, and these are meant to provide reference material or just amuse, so feel free to click through. I would recommend sending your liberal friends over to see why their thinking is flawed, but getting a liberal to understand logic is like getting a giraffe to pilot a wind-powered airplane.
 

1:       Evolution vs. Climate Change:

Liberals love to present themselves as embracing evolution and being enlightened vs. us “Religious Zealots” who hold to the flat earth.  Yet they try to keep the earth’s climate stagnant and prevent the whole system from changing and the organisms on it from evolving.
 

Redneck Recycling:

Whenever I speak out against the liberal view of global warming, it seems that I get accused of being some illiterate redneck. Well, for your information, sir, rednecks have been protecting the environment and recycling stuff before it was hip, and still you look down on us. So I felt the need to provide you with a few examples.
 

2:       Big Government vs. Big Business:

Liberals seem to embrace larger and larger government, yet rail on and on against big business.  The very thought that government is always benevolent is in itself a symptom of defective thinking, but I plan to look at it from a logical standpoint and the differences between the two.

There are three main differences between Big Business and Big Government:
 

1.    Businesses cannot place you in jail for refusing to buy their goods or services, or in any other way force you to give them YOUR money.

2.    Businesses cannot charge you for services they perform only for your neighbor.

3.    If businesses try to accomplish 1 or 2, you can pursue them in court.
 

3:       Capitalism vs. Democracy:

Why is it that so many “Democrats” hate Capitalism, when Capitalism and Democracy are nearly one and the same?  Capitalism, in its purest form, is Democracy, every minute of every day, using money to cast votes.  A business (politician) that does not offer the consumer (voter) something that they want will not get their money (votes).  So why is it that liberals, who identify with the Democrat Party, are afraid of this?  Could it be that they are actually afraid of the voters?
 

Redneck Business:

Rednecks love private business.  Except for the 90’s, Rednecks were poorly represented by the government.  We also have a poor record when it comes to interacting with government agencies.
 

4:       Evolution vs. Animal Protection:

This is similar 1 above, but here I hope to explore the incessant need to push those dying whales back into the ocean rather than chop them up for food, or to save the Flat-spired three-toothed Snail, in view of evolution.
 
Animals evolve through natural selection to ensure species survival.  This often occurs due to changes in the environment.  This can involve human or natural intervention.  Yet when humans intervene to encourage evolution, the animal rights crowd goes nuts!
 

5:       Gun Control vs. Government Protection:

So many liberals want to get weapons out of the hands of the people and leave us to rely on government (police) protection, yet they complain about police cruelty and the inadequacies of FEMA.

Without guns, We the People, have the potential of becoming victims of government abuses and excesses.  This is the very reason behind the 2nd Amendment.  But if the people were disarmed, it would make it much easier for The Party to collect taxes from the evil rich?
 

Redneck Gun Control:

Tips for good gun control from people that know.
 

6:       Feminism vs. the Sexual Revolution:

Feminism used to be based on the fact that men and women are created equal.  Somehow this went hand in hand with the sexual revolution where women are taken advantage of solely for their bodies, and not for their minds.  Have you ever met a male “enlightened liberal” who wasn’t also a womanizer (or gay)?

 

7:       Diversity vs. …Everything:

Too many that espouse “diversity” often also espouse policies that actually reduce diversity.  I’m talking about diversity of thought, diversity of opinion, diversity of actions.  The liberal position seems to be that people are too stupid to do anything for themselves, or make their own decisions, so we are going to mandate these things that we think are good for you.  Seatbelts – no dissension allowed.  Smoking – no dissension allowed.  Guns – no dissension allowed. And these are their good points.

Seeing as there is a lot of money to be made in promoting diversity, the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde is going into full swing.

8:       Money vs. Money:

We have learned from many on the left over the years that, “It’s not about the money.  You can be rich in so many other ways!”  Yet, at the same time, they make constant calls for more money for this, that, and the other, usually to be paid by “The Rich.”

“Money doesn’t buy happiness.”  This is what we’re told by feel good liberals when talking about the accomplishments of some business leader.  If that is the case, then why do they feel the need to expand the welfare rolls?  These people may already be rich in love.  Why do they always demean those who have made it big time for themselves, and for their kids?  Why is it that they want to take their hard earned money, if it’s not important?

Those of the Crimson Cranium cabal love money.  As such, the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde is proud to announce their latest program: the Scarlet Collection of Assets Mechanism.

9:       Religion vs. The State:

We have heard for many years now about the “Separation of Church and State.”  We have also heard that “You cannot legislate morality!”  Yet many government programs, from Welfare to Social Security, from Nationalized Health Care to Carbon Credits rely on an appeal to our morality and our often are justified on religious grounds. It seems that liberals are fine using religion to get what they want, but reluctant to turn to it to receive what they need.

In some parts of the country you can be blasted as bitter for clinging to religion, but in redneck country it can mark you as someone who doesn’t hunt and isn’t too lazy to get up on Sunday.

10:     The Individual vs. The Collective:

Liberals love to place people in neat little groups, such as Christian Conservatives, Gays, Blacks, Women, and so forth.  This alignment of people provides them with neat little categories to lump people into while they can ignore the individuals that make up the groups.  The Individual is an anathema to those who worship the Collective.


Next up on the plate here at R&R: “Why I’m an Unapologetic Conservative”, another multi-part series.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming Update


Global warming update:


Could Global Warming have prevented these tragic deaths?

Help advance Global Warming. Invest in
Carbon Resets today.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Redhead Money


This is a companion piece to the
Money vs. Money portion of Liberal Logic.

Those of the Crimson Cranium cabal love money. As such, the Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde is proud to announce their latest program: the Scarlet Collection of Assets Mechanism.

The S.C.A.M. program will henceforth be set up to collect funds from our dark- and light-haired oppressors. As of the current embodiment of this program, C.A.S.H. members will not be required to contribute. This is subject to change, however, depending on administrative costs and other factors.

Proceeds from S.C.A.M will initially go towards education efforts to highlight the plight of the Red Headed Human. Such education programs will highlight such tribulations as public harassment due to spotted pigmentation, the effects of the sun on those of the extreme fair skinned, red haired persuasion, and the potential emotional harm that can happen from handling our hair without our go-ahead, or conspicuous constant colloquial requests to confirm the colossal keenness for coupling.

After education efforts get underway, it is hoped that the S.C.A.M. program will also serve to enrich the lives of those Ginger groups who have been especially harmed through discrimination, harassment, and bigotry. Most prominent among these groups are the members of the Crimson Apex Town Hall’ers (CATHeters (Because we’ll take the fight straight to your pee-hole!)) as noted on the sidebar to the right.

It should be noted that the S.C.A.M. program is currently a voluntary program. This is subject to change as well, and will be evaluated periodically based on the number of donations received, the convenience of corporate cash and the quantity of Crimson Cranium corporate cronies at each location, as well as an assessment to ensure a large percentage of the CATHeter members blogs appear on other Town Hall blogrolls.

C.A.S.H. also reserves the right to evaluate the need for Red Head Reparations based on the success of the S.C.A.M. program.

On a side note:

It appears after preliminary analysis that the newly named Vice Presidential nominee for the Republican Party has Red Hair, and therefore gets the endorsement of C.A.S.H. It’s just a shame that we cannot just get a VP without having to take a P!

C.A.S.H.: Because Red is more than just a State of Mind; Red is Right!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Biden Opening

Ok, so B.O. named Joe Biden for his Vice Presidential running mate this last week. Much has already been written on the various gaffs and misstatements made by Biden, and on what he has said in praise of McCain and to disparage B.O. But I have a different take on the Biden pick. You knew that I would!

He had a chance to pick someone who really stood up for everyone, someone who could point to his background and say that he could “feel your pain,” the great B.O. picks Joe Biden.

Joe Biden is proud of his former slave state of Delaware, saying that they would have joined the Confederacy, if only they could have figured “out how to get to the South.” Joe Biden has referred to B.O. as “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.” As opposed to the other kind, eh Joe? Perhaps Joe Biden has been hanging around the other Democrat leader proud of his white history, Robert “KKK” Byrd. It’s the Bobby Joe twins! Uncle Joe Biden’s attitude apparently goes for others who are non-white, as well. He was the one who proposed dividing up Iraq into racial groups as a solution to their problems. “Separate but Equal,” Joe?

Perhaps the reason that B.O. is open to this kind of thing is because he feels the same way. It won’t be the first time that some “uppity” black man has been accused of “speaking down to black people.”

Barack's primary role model, his father, was a black man and, as the song says, "[His] daddy gave [him] a name, then he walked away."  Leaving young Barry "a scared [black] boy in a [white] neighborhood."  Perhaps this bitterness toward his father for leaving him and his mother accounts for his Cosby moment in which he beseeched black men to stand up for their families.  His half sister, a white-asian, figures prominently in his campaign, while his half brother, a black African, sits in a hut and lives on a dollar a month.

Barack was also raised for many of his formative years by an old racist white woman who feared black men who passed by her on the street. How much of this did he absorb? As a youth, Obama spent much of his time surrounded by people who were not black. How much of their Typical White Racism did he pick up? He couldn’t identify with black people. The most that he knew about them was what he had been told by his white friends and family.

He went to Harvard in the late 1980’s, in that bastion of white-itude, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Not a place known at the time for their high black attendance rates. If he had time to see any “real” blacks there, I’m sure he didn’t spend much time associating with them in between studies and editing the paper. In fact, he says that it wasn’t until Chicago that, “I discovered I was black, and I have remained so ever since.”

He apparently went to a church that preached “Liberation Theology” in Chicago, but never seems to have gone to church to hear a sermon. Did he know, at all, what his pastor was saying in the pulpit? Maybe if he did, he would have left much sooner. After all, Reverend Wright’s views do not reflect his.

Meanwhile, even Michelle Obama’s hospital turns away minorities from the surrounding neighborhoods.

Many of Obama’s policies also reflect his hatred toward blacks. He supports “Immigrant Rights,” which affect the working poor and the black communities the most. He opposes school vouchers, which have been shown to benefit blacks stuck in failing inner city schools. He supports abortion and the Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood, which has been shown to disproportionally kill off black babies.

So my question for Mr. Barack Hussein Obama is this:

Why do you hate black people? Why do you take them for granted? Why do you talk down to them so often? Why do you celebrate the endorsement of Robert Byrd? Why did you choose one of the whitest running mates you could find? Do you agree with his racist views about black people?
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (23) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Individual vs. The Collective


This is part ten, and the final chapter (here, at least), in the ongoing saga of Liberal Logic. You can find the other parts
here.

Liberals love to place people in neat little groups, such as Christian Conservatives, Gays, Blacks, Women, and so forth. This alignment of people provides them with neat little categories to lump people into while they can ignore the individuals that make up the groups. The Individual is an anathema to those who worship the Collective. If you don’t believe that liberals are at war with the idea of Individualism, go here.

(Author’s note: Yes, I know that I am also grouping Liberals into a neat little group in this essay. If you are a Liberal or Progressyve and this does not apply to you, please accept my apologies. As I said in my original post, in this series I will make many generalities, so don’t bore me with cries of “Not me!”  Don’t worry; I’ll get to you another time.)

The left hates those Individuals who refuse to fall into one of their groups. This is why they detest those like Clarence Thomas, Michelle Malkin, Condoleezza Rice, and others who refuse to join them on their plantation. It is worthy of note that those that belong to one of the many “Minority Groups” (as determined by them) that come out for Conservatism are the ones that are most hated. They have ruined their method of categorizing people, and have shown that there really are Individuals out there who refuse to be categorized! If you belong to a protected minority class and intend to go against the liberal agenda, be forewarned that you may be headed down a short road.

They support their favorite programs, such as “Climate Change” based on consensus science. They denigrate those who refuse to give in to their collective view as ignorant rednecks and worse. They conveniently ignore those that have fostered scientific revolutions through their own work, such as Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, and possibly Garrett Lisi. They promote the Appeal to Authority argument by listing other collectivist organizations which leads to the question, “If those people jumped off a bridge, would you?”

By collecting these people into groups, and then promising each group their own version of a chicken for their pot, they try to collect a grand coalition to overcome the natural American Spirit of Individualism, Self Reliance, and Liberty.

The placement of people into groups also serves the Sun Tzu technique of Divide and Conquer. From “
The Art of War” Chapter VI, Weak Points and Strong:

12. If we do not wish to fight, we can prevent the enemy from engaging us even though the lines of our encampment be merely traced out on the ground.  All we need do is to throw something odd and unaccountable in his way.

13. By discovering the enemy's dispositions and remaining invisible ourselves, we can keep our forces concentrated, while the enemy's must be divided.

14. We can form a single united body, while the enemy must split up into fractions.  Hence there will be a whole pitted against separate parts of a whole, which means that we shall be many to the enemy's few.
 
By dividing the people of this Great Country they can conquer the political climate and get their agenda pushed forward.

As Conservatives, we understand that the population of any group is made up of Individuals. When a madman went on a rampage in a church, we condemn the Individual. The liberal condemns the group he supposedly belongs to.

Where the liberal elevation of the Collective falls apart is in the elevation of their political leaders. When B. J. Clinton committed perjury and lied to the American people, the left covered for him like cheese on hash browns. When people who get paid to lie for a living utter political commentary, the left treats it like the gospel. And when a tall guy with black hair that earns six figures as a lawyer who is married to a lawyer and went to an Ivy League school with slave holding ancestors who claims to be a Christian runs for President of the United States, the left gets shivers down their legs and faint at every appearance.

The left also hates the Individual because the Individual represents everything that they despise. The Individual may make choices that liberals disagree with, or that are not for the common good. The Individual must not have the right to defend his self. The Individual must not be able to make choices about what products to buy and sell. The Individual must not be able to decide who is going to receive his charitable donations. The Individual must not be able to place himself above others.

So remember, You are unique, You are good enough, You are smart enough, and doggone it, people like You.

So why do they place everyone into neat little groups? Why are many of their most powerful arguments simply appeals to authority?  Why do they hate the Individual? Why do they profess to sacrifice the one for the many? The answer, my friends, is simple:

It’s not about you, me, or even us, it’s about Control.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (18) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Redneck Religion


This is a companion piece to part nine of Liberal Logic, Religion vs. the State, found
here.

In some parts of the country you can be blasted as bitter for clinging to religion, but in redneck country it can mark you as someone who isn’t too lazy to get up on Sunday.

In redneck country, we love our Jesus. That is why, when it comes to going to church, we always wear our best Sunday outfits for the occasion.

We believe in honoring the Commandments of God. We are proud to honor the sanctity of marriage, and celebrate accordingly. We appreciate the chance to read our Bibles wherever we may be.

In redneck country, we believe that people should be able to practice their religion any way they choose. If that means staying home on Sundays and catching a race, well so be it. We’ll talk about you while you ain’t here, but we won’t hold it against you in the long run. Just so long as you don’t sit there in the pews while your preacher spouts hatred for this country and them claim you ain’t heard it.


1.  The finance committee refuses to provide funds for the purchase of a chandelier because none of the members knows how to play one.
2.  People ask, when they learn that Jesus fed the 5000, whether the two fish were bass or catfish, and what bait was used to catch 'em.
3.    When the pastor says, "I'd like to ask Bubba to help take up the offering," five guys and two women stand up.
4.    Opening day of deer season is recognized as an official church holiday.
5.    A member of the church requests to be buried in his 4-wheel-drive truck because "It ain't never been in a hole it couldn't get out of."
6.    The choir is known as the "OK Chorale."
7.    In a congregation of 500 members, there are only seven last names in the church directory.
8.    People think "rapture" is what you get when you lift something too heavy.
9.    The baptismal pool is a #2 galvanized "Wheeling" washtub.
10.The choir robes were donated by and embroidered with the logo from Billy Bob's Barbecue.
11.The collection plates are really hubcaps from a '56 Chevy.
12.Instead of a bell you are called to service by a duck call.
13.The minister and his wife drive matching pickup trucks.
14.The communion wine is Boone's Farm "Tickled Pink".
15."Thou shall not covet" applies to huntin' dogs, too.
16.The final words of the benediction are, "Y'all come back now, Ya hear."
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CASH Statement: For Immediate Press Release


The
Crimson Apex Solidarity Horde would like to express its support for the Retards in boycotting the movie R